Frameworking 9
Let’s look at game theory. Because what is happening in Victoria, Australia and much of the world is like the early and middle sections of a chess game. The end game is already known and each move has this in mind. But the audience watching the game are mostly unaware of this. What they, the audience, believe to be naturally unfolding, is in reality a series of intentional manipulated manoeuvres. The media has been absorbed into a master-plan and is used as the messaging platform to gradually indoctrinate the audience (the general population) without their knowledge. Many other institutions are likewise infiltrated, bought and brought into service of the end game plan. As in a chess game, each move is calculated with the end game as the ultimate aim. What does the end game look like. There are many features. Firstly it will require all the pieces (players) to be compliant to the rules of the game, except in this particular game the rules are imposed by the game designers, who have a definite type of end game in mind. Compliance is a key feature of the end game and therefore those who do not comply with the rules of the game will be like chess pieces that are no longer actively involved. They have been removed from the actual game. Those who are left on the chess board are compliant and accepting of whatever the rules dictate. If this means being vaccinated then they will obey. The real problem with this game is simply that a game is not life. Life is what is actually happening rather than a game that is only a representation of it. When the game becomes the dominant power, life is rendered subservient to the rules of the game. This implies that the illusion rules over reality. This is what is happening. Every message broadcast to the masses is a manoeuvre designed to incrementally move the game closer to its aims. Its aims are to control the game and all the players. And to eliminate those who rebel against playing, one way or another. Real life is about being free to play or not play. The game is only about obeying the rules of the game. There is no permitted freedom to exist in any other way. Play the game or else! What appears to be natural within the game are actually intentionally chosen moves. Intentional media interviews. Intentional subliminal messages that reinforce the central orientation, and ridicule and demean any other narrative. This manufactured game creates a cult following. That is another part of the game plan. It must have its Queens and Kings. The pawns are dispensable but not so the more powerful pieces. And especially not the Queens and Kings. They are the major representatives of the game itself. If the game was in truth a way for the players to become free and fulfil their human potential as spiritual beings, then surely the game would be worthy of playing and supporting. But what if the game is not about freedom, but rather enslavement? What is the ancient prophesies that tell of a time when there will be a war of all against all is true? What if that is the Armeggedon of our present times? What if our very minds and hearts are being manipulated, lied to and indoctrinated? What is our souls are at an evolutional threshold and what we choose to perceive and understand has never been so important? And finally, what if we can begin to see through the game and liberate ourselves from its hypnotic yet illusory single narrative, might be the magnificent possibilities awaiting us on the other side of the game. When the game itself is superseded and life in its true nature, wisdom, truth and love becomes as a real cultural transformation for our world?
No particular framework, whether religious, scientific or secular, is the ultimate truth. No word, thought or spoken, describes an ultimate truth. Language is by its very nature, symbolic. And yet linguistic frameworks are very important. Because that is how we make sense of everything. The trick is to think or express in ways that reflect everything in ways that are truly meaningful and moral. Because the cosmos itself is meaningful and moral. But politics as it is generally structured deviates from this natural cosmic archetype. The polarising and adversarial system of two or three party so-called democracy pits one party against the other. Now, more than ever, all major political parties are ruled over by greater corporate and other entities. This is the floating question posed: how can a sane, humane and creative transformation of human civilisation occur when the same string-pullers (Puppet-masters) rule over all major political parties? The differences between political parties are in the main superficial. When a political party starts to become more popular it too become infiltrated by forces that do not want radical change, but rather support the status-quo. The cosmic archetype that professor David Bohm referred to as ‘the implicate order’, presents a living model of bio-diversity and inter-dependence. A conscious external manifestation of this implicate order would be explicately beautiful and integrated. Our political establishments generally seem incapable of achieving this to any profound extent. To the contrary, they seem grid-locked into systems that are oriented towards narcissism, disharmony and destruction. If human hierarchical systems do not reflect the principles inherent in the living cosmos and within the human soul, then we as individuals need to take the power back into ourselves and form communities that orient towards such a cosmic, spiritual model. This is an orientation that would frame our human view points into a cohesive and caring re-establishment of systems that actually serve the essential needs of all humanity, all other sentient beings and the natural environment that is our earthly mother. This would transcend the vested interests of all particular groups and be truly universal in its heartfelt and intelligent impulses. Unity in diversity would be the golden thread of a new politics. Freedom would walk side by side with love and truth.
Not a diversity as opposition in order to create a totalitarian new world order. Not vested interests, of corrupt elitist power and monopolising of wealth for a few at the expense of the many. Not an out of control pharmaceutical industry controlling health by violating the Hippocratic oath. Not using police or military to subdue and arrest those who speak out for their basic human rights. Not a fear based censorship of free expression supported by corporately owned and monopolised social media.
We as individuals and together as communities can choose the path ahead, every moment in the present: in small incremental ways and when possible in destiny moments that create quantum shifts in the social fabric.
This is the great threshold humanity faces right now.
To be continued.
Frameworking 7
Frameworking when managed and mediated by autonomous thinking can be a force for transformative change. Autonomous thinking is achieved when consciousness itself realises its sovereign status. With a meditative inner concentration, it becomes possible for consciousness to realise itself as source of its own power of thinking. It becomes self-evident that consciousness is a universal force of life and is within the human organism and can reflect this truth in human language. It can say ‘I Am and I know that I Am.’ And ‘I Am, therefore I think’. Therefore I am the architect of my frameworking; of how I frame my world view. As an autonomous thinker partaking of the great mystery of Consciousness, I Am the source of whatever I think. This capacity to think one’s own autonomous thoughts is an awesome power. No super computer can outstrip the human power of thinking. This power of thinking is not a mechanical epi-phenomenon of the brain. It is the cosmos using the brain to think within the corporeal entity we refer to as a human being. This is who you are: the cosmos as a fractal of itself. And the cosmos as you, is conscious. Thus human thinking is sacred, but only truly so when self realised and expressed in ways that reflect its own sacred nature. Such framing of thought gives to human language a divine quality. It is the real secret reason why we incarnate. Until realising this truth we stumble around in a foggy illusion. With a meditative practice consciousness gradually glimpses this truth as an inner experience. Thought itself loosens it’s false preoccupation with external objects, or with inner reflections of every type, and becomes aware of itself as the movement within consciousness; a movement of conscious cosmos or cosmic consciousness, that is both universal and personal simultaneously. And then an exploration can begin to investigate the qualities that live within this consciousness. Human language has always given linguistic expression to these qualities: qualities of the soul. And words such as wisdom, truth, love and spirit, for example, then indicate qualities that are experienced beyond the realm of ideas. This is the threshold between experience and thinking. And at best thinking can then frame ideas that are worthy of actual spiritual experience. What is truly fascinating about this, is that each individual can become an autonomous frameworker. This is freedom of thought and speech at its most sublime, inspired by impulses that are inherent within consciousness itself. If the external world was a manifestation of such thinking we would have heaven on earth. We would have wisdom, truth and love manifest as a spiritual world culture. It is this that we are evolving towards. No transhumanistic bio-technical future can be a true substitute for what the naturally awakened human being is capable of.
Frameworking 6
Andrew Harvey introduced me to the concept of Sacred activism, firstly through his book ‘Hope’ and then by getting to know him personally. He has been an example of this principle of sacred activism, that combines a meditative perception of the sacred with worldly activism. So I feel to dedicate this chapter to Andrew, and within the spirit of this approach, revisit the topic of frameworking. Because it is felt insufficient to only think, talk and write about things. There is an impulse to ‘do’ something; to allow my embodied (incarnated) self to contribute to change: to be a sacred activist. But how? It is interesting to re-frame my thinking along these lines. It stirs the impulse to want to use my embodied self, or have my embodied self be used, for a greater purpose. That greater purpose is to be an agent of change, but what type of change?
I’ll tell you something I’m discovering. More and more individuals all around the world are awakening. More and more are speaking out as sacred activists and are doing amazing things. There is hope. I’m compiling a list of amazing people, and I’ll share it here. They are courageously speaking out at this time of great need.
Andrew Harvey (Author and sacred activist)
Robert Kennedy Junior (Lawyer and activist)
Dr Judy Mikovits (Senior Epidimologist).
Dr Dolores Cahill (Irish Medical Board)
Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson (Neurologist)
Zach Bush (MD)
Dr Rashid Buttar (Osteopathic Physician)
Dr Christiane Northrup (obstratacian and gynaecologist)
Dr Carrie Madej (Internal Medicine Specialist)
Dr Andrew Kaufman (Psychiatrist)
Dr Andrew Wakefield (Physician)
Del Bigtree (tv and film producer)
Mikki Willlis (film maker)
Dr Thomas Cowan (Anthroposophical Doctor)
Line In The Sand (Documentary)
Plandemic (Documentary)
Plandemic 2 Indoctrination (Documentary)
Dr David Martin (Harvard Medical School)
Sasha Stone (film maker)
Deborah Tavares (Enviromental Scientist)
Pete Evans (tv presenter)
Rocco Galati (lawyer)
Susan Stanfield (Canadian activist)
Dr Sherri Tenpenny (Osteopathic Physician)
Michael Tellenger (South African politician)
Ricardo Bossi (Australian politician)
Dr Jeff Barke (Family Physician)
Dr Kelly Brogan (Holistic Psychiatrist)
Dr Malcolm Hendricks (Family Physician)
Caitlin Johnstone (Social critic)
Jeff Kennett (Ex-Premier of Victoria)
Prof Thomas Borody (Australian gastroenterologist)
Nicolas Perlas (Phillipno Author and activist)
Mieke Mosmuller (Anthroposophist)
Li-Meng-Yan (Virologist)
Michael 0’Bernicia (Historian and film maker)
Jon Rappoporte (Invesigative journalist)
Dr Reiner Fuellmich (Lawyer)
Brian Rose (Archeologist)
David Icke (Activist bad author)
Serene Teffeha (Australian lawyer)
Keith Simons (Author and activist)
Rowan Atkinson (Comedian and actor)
James Newbury (Victorian politician)
Lorie Ladd (spiritual guide)
Annika Smethurst (Australian journalist)
Marian Turski (Auscwitz survivor)
Josh Trent (Media interviewer)
Augusto Zimmerman (Professor of Law)
Dr Simon Thornley (Epedimologist)
Dr Eamonn Mathieson (aenethesist)
Vernon Coleman (author of over 100 books)
Spiri Skouras (Independent journalist)
Aleksandr Lukshenko (President of Belarus)
Jamie McIntyre (CNN correspondent)
Yogi Matsyendranath (Yogi of Nath tradition)
Larry Cook (film and video)
Professor Catherine Bennet (Epidemiology)
Morgan Jonas (Researcher of PCR tests and film maker)
Samir Bongo (Solicitor)
Dr Brian Tyson (Medical Doctor)
Mike Adams (alternative nutritionist)
Kristen Meghan (mask expert. OSHA)
Brendan McKenna (Investigative Journalist)
Emery Smith (scientist)
Paul Hellyer (Canadian Politician, etc)
Randy Hillier (Canadian politician)
Catherine Austin Fitts (activist)
Tammy Clarke (mask expert. OSHA)
Kristi Noem (Governor of South Dakota)
You may not resonate with everyone on this list, but they are all worth listening to or reading. And this list could be lengthened many times over. Here is the hope. That as the storm clouds gather, a vast number of brave and wise souls put their lives on the line to speak their truths. This is the time of the great battle of forces: truth against lies: freedom against tyranny: Utopia against Transhumanism. What type of frameworking will we support?
To be continued
Frameworking 5
The single most adversarial force opposing love and truth is dishonesty. Dishonesty is itself complex. It is often not obvious. Indeed, on one level it is inculturated. We are born into a cultural lie. Social conditioning begins as soon as we incarnate into a social framework. The lie is inbuilt into the social fabric. It has become imbibed (absorbed) into the human psyche and has manifested in our social structures. Human thinking reflects this social conditioning and language expresses it. But the forces of love and truth are also present within the human psyche. And therefore, there exists an internal and external battle of forces, whether consciously realised or not. It is this battle within our own consciousness that needs to be healed and re-integrated if the external battle is to be transformed. This brings us back to the topic of dishonesty. How does the individual begin to approach one’s own conditioned dishonesty? What questions are relevant that can break open the layered lies that have been accumulated through the years? Where is the key to opening Pandora’s treasure chest? I would suggest that this is a very personal journey but one whereby one can begin by taking the topic seriously. Because the topic relates to one’s own life: or rather to the potential inherent within the human condition. This potential implies that dishonesty can be transformed into an authentic experience of loving, truthful creativity. In other words, our ways of framing perceptions and thoughts can be guided by love and truth. Frameworking can be a force of benevolent, honest, autonomous creativity. This is our inherent birthright to realise and express. But the dragon at the threshold includes unconscious levels of dishonesty that demand being made conscious. This is a vital part of the great inner work. It is why we have incarnated. The external lies that surround us in the external human environment are as mirrors to our inner human condition. We can observe the dishonest external frameworking as various exposures of what exists within the human psyche. And as the external frameworks become more powerfully expressed so the mirror itself becomes energised. Now is the time for a deep inward turning. Now is the time to ask oneself questions that will break open one’s own conditioned and habitual dishonesty. It is vital we do this and reorient ourselves towards embodying the forces of love and truth. Taking this direction individually and with others of like-mind, can build a new network of collective power that will be a counter-force to the outworn paradigm of inherited dishonesty.
To be continued.
Frameworking 4
Frameworking at a personal level is how we try and make sense of ourselves and the world. Personal biography is included in that. In recent times I have increasingly realised that the quality of frameworking depends on what inner forces are motivating it. And one of the greatest benevolent forces is that of love. The longing for love, when eventually experienced, transforms the one who longed for it. But the other primary force is that of truth. Both are alchemies that transform the quality of how we frame our world view. Perception itself undergoes an alchemical transformation when influenced by love and truth. Perceptions influenced by love or truth are very different from perceptions influenced by fear or anger, for instance. The way we frame our world views differ greatly depending on our emotional underpinnings.
Frameworking itself is a universal human tendency. Every adult frames their world view with selective ideas and information that justify a desire for certainty. Therefore, there are many forces at play besides that of love and truth. The desire for certainty itself is a quite different energy from that of the need to feel love or know truth. How do we reconcile these very different energies?
In Melbourne at this time the need for certainty appears stronger than the need for love or truth. This is how the rhetoric surrounding Covid has been transmitted by politicians, health ‘experts’ and mainstream media. The need for certainty has led to a massive degree of fear, anxiety, helplessness, mistrust, anger, paranoia and depression. It has led to most people becoming disempowered and compliant. It had also led to a widening gap between two opposing world-views, interpretations, and mind-sets regarding covid. There is a distinct lack of love within this toxic mental and emotional environment. The different frameworks of perception do not allow for social cohesion. On top of this covid related situation there are broader issues at play: no less than everything that is happening to the world. Whatever position one takes, there are multiple so-called experts lining up to support the chosen ‘truth’. How is a truth seeker to navigate throught this quagmire of vastly differing view points? The first question should be ‘are you a truth seeker?’ Or are you simply accepting what you are told? Are you simply trusting the so-called experts or authorities of the mainstream media? How does one even become a truth seeker? What does that imply?
There is a difference between two types of truth. One type relates to the inner and the other the outer. The inner truth depends on the ability to be honest about one’s own human condition. That in itself is a great challenge. But outer truth, the truth regarding phenomena external to oneself is a whole other ball game. It depends on perceiving external phenomena clearly, and in regards to what is the truth about covid, for example, that depends on what information one believes to be true. When this extends to what is happening to the world in general, the search for external truth becomes extremely complex. How am I to frame my world view with a sense that it is aligned with the truth? The actual difficulty that this uncomfortable complexity confronts the truth seeker with is itself a truth. How does one go beyond personal bias in one’s particular frameworking? I am not going to jump into easy responses to these questions. They pose quite different issues to those related to my need to love. Truth and love do not necessarily sit easily at the same table together. And it is here that I do sit. Uncomfortably as a potential mediator between love and truth. My consciousness itself with its natural ability to think and ask questions is the overseer and navigator in this quest for love and truth. And the only report I can honestly give to this ongoing search (and research) is that the situation is fluid. I am learning as I go. Changing as I move. The need for certainty is seen as a trap. Covid is perceived as a great riddle. The world itself too is experienced as a riddle defying my desire for certainty. The need for love and truth are seen as driving forces, but they are realised as unattainable by any ordinary means. The insight that my particular way of frameworking might be faulty keeps me open. And yet, I cannot simply sit on the fence and say I know nothing. Fence-sitting would render me impotent and ineffective.
I take my stand and in conscious recognition of my need for love and truth, and say ‘this is a work in progress’.
